(i) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane

Object

Representation ID: 1555

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

5bi Where are the planned roads, schools and services including land available for allotments. Warwick Gates are still waiting for the school promised by Gallagher when they built there. Who are the people and companies wishing to move here?

Object

Representation ID: 1607

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

2500 dwellings represents approximately 2750 additional vehicles onto Harbury Lane,(on engineers'figures an extra 13,750 journeys onto this lane. Widening duallings etc, (presumably at developers' cost) would n ot avoid the problems ib Warwick-Castle Hill, Banbury Rd/Gallows Hill junction, Princes Drive , Parade, Leamington or Radford Road, Sydenham/Willes Road junctions - absolutely crazy !!!! - to introduce further sites of employment to add to this "prefered option" is, I repeat- CRAZY!!!

Object

Representation ID: 1669

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1693

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

No - It is too dangerous now with traffic levels and roads cannot be altered within the area without affecting the quality of life for the residents.

Object

Representation ID: 1777

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1803

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1818

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Already have a large amount of industrial units etc estates - not even fully occupied.

Support

Representation ID: 1925

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Object

Representation ID: 2039

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

more consultation and research needed

Object

Representation ID: 2136

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Tachbrook Park is alread a large spread of severe hangar-style structures which ruin the approach to Warwick and Leamington Spa for visitors and residents. This would not be tolerated on Kenilworth Road.

Object

Representation ID: 2302

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2384

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Support

Representation ID: 2421

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2473

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Mr G.C. Allman

More units that will lay endlessly dormant - no! Where does the council think that the businesses/jobs to fill these units will come from?
There are numerous examples of industrial units in the area that have not been taken up - why add to them!

Support

Representation ID: 2522

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 2607

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2667

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Yes but I am concerned that residents of that southern area are to lose an important area of open land - a lung for that part of the city.

Support

Representation ID: 2730

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Yes in phases 1,2, and 3 provide a new primary school was built to accommodate their needs.

Object

Representation ID: 2826

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Lack of infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 2865

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2922

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

STRONGLY OBJECT - This land must be retained as an area of restraint to properly separate Bishops Tachbrook from the major towns and also to preserve excellent agricultural land.

Object

Representation ID: 2969

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Object to any more arable or livestock land being put over to housing.

Object

Representation ID: 3027

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Rhyan Barry

Object

Support

Representation ID: 3056

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Alison Oliver

Good connections to M40 and station

Object

Representation ID: 3072

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

There is already a concentration of industrial development to the south of Leamington, ie. Heathcote.

Object

Representation ID: 3141

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

STRONGLY OBJECT - This land must be retained as an area of restraint to properly separate Bishops Tachbrook from the major towns and also to preserve excellent agricultural land.

Support

Representation ID: 3195

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Support

Representation ID: 3219

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

already employment nearby and good transport links

Object

Representation ID: 3256

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

As above 5a.

Object

Representation ID: 3348

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Christopher Gibb

Object mainly because the roads around here are all jammed up in the rush hour and there is no capacity for any more communities on the M40 - Europa Way axis.