(i) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 110
Received: 06/07/2009
Respondent: R A Chapleo
Yes - this will allow development in an area of gretest need without the constriction of the Green Belt.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 163
Received: 07/07/2009
Respondent: mr John Wheatcroft
Perhaps light industry or small industrial estates or perhaps business centre's. Perhaps an area where new startup businesses could flourish, on say a cheap rental
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 180
Received: 11/07/2009
Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes
This option enables development to focus on an area with capacity to meet employment needs, without encroaching on the Green Belt.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 205
Received: 03/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter
Strongly object. These houses will back onto a small village that has very few resources, a run down and empty pub, a small school and tiny shop, the village will no longer remain a village and therefore I strongly object. The part time doctor surgery won't be able to cope, there is little parking
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 250
Received: 10/07/2009
Respondent: Patricia Robinson
There is already too much employment land in the area.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 317
Received: 21/07/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam
Too near a village which would be swamped and taken over by any development.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 343
Received: 22/07/2009
Respondent: Peter Pounds
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 421
Received: 27/07/2009
Respondent: Peter Clarke
I object on the grounds of traffic grid locks. The Harbury Lane is already heavily congested and is too narrow for heavy vehicles and at least 10,000 more cars.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 472
Received: 24/07/2009
Respondent: Georgina Wilson
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 542
Received: 27/07/2009
Respondent: Mr A M Webley
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 594
Received: 03/08/2009
Respondent: B A Alston
Support this proposed location
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 604
Received: 23/07/2009
Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 665
Received: 06/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs Susan Edkins
rural area spoil the rural aspect
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 680
Received: 10/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs Sheila Smith
Traffic issues on what is too narrow a road to take yet more traffic.
Quality of life for those living on Harbury Lane who have seen their country lane turn into a traffic nightmare over the last ten years.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 695
Received: 10/08/2009
Respondent: P.A. Yarwood
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 766
Received: 05/08/2009
Respondent: Faye Davis
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 834
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Adrian Farmer
No need for more building. A large percentage of business property is currently empty and without the new homes this will not be necessary
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 898
Received: 19/08/2009
Respondent: Christine Betts
Residential Area and roads would not support increased traffic and it is supposed to be a rural area!
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 943
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Mr David Clough
Not enought thought gone in re. Transport,schools,shops,employment
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 951
Received: 22/08/2009
Respondent: Mr Ed Rycroft
I object to industrial use of this lands due to:
Insufficient road infrastructure. - There is already a large volume of traffic between the M40 and the roads leading into Leamington. Including along Europa Way. Traffic from a development at Harbury lane would simply add to the ridiculous volume of traffic seen at present. This added to the proposed 4500 houses in the same area would destroy any access to either town or the M40 at peak travel times.
As there is no school in the area of Warwick Gates nearly all children are driven to school adding to this problem.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 964
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Kirit Marvania
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1058
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham
Limited Use. Good Landscaping.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1059
Received: 24/08/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson
Green field site too far out to be central and too big an area for the link roads to M40. With major congestion, the Warwick Gates housing estate will become a dangerous cut through to existing commercial land and the town centre.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1166
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Barry Elliman
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1219
Received: 24/08/2009
Respondent: Andrew Horsley
There are several industrial units that lie vacant already on Tachbrook Park, Heathcote Ind, Sydenham, Queensway and Warwick Technology Park. Why do we need more?
NB: Several have lain vacant for many years.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1267
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave
I object to industrial use of this land due to:
Insufficient road infrastructure. - There is already a large volume of traffic between the M40 and the roads leading into Leamington. Including along Europa Way. Traffic from a development at Harbury lane would simply add to the ridiculous volume of traffic seen at present. This added to the proposed 4500 houses in the same area would destroy any access to either town or the M40 at peak travel times.
As there is no school in the area of Warwick Gates nearly all children are driven to school adding to this problem.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1289
Received: 24/08/2009
Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley
Lots have been empty for years. New ones not justified
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1357
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
The authority needs to provide more available employment land.
Our clients, the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association, their future needs may be more compatible to a rural location, and this may be more suitable given the nature of the use - which is a dog training school.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1542
Received: 29/08/2009
Respondent: Mr Mark Roberts
This geenral area is already heavy with employement areas (Spa Park, Tachbrook Park, Gallagher Park) - many of which with spare building areas which have not bee built on for years. Existing housing in Wawrick gates was sold as a 'village location' with green field views - putting a mixed use estate all around would transform rural life into a concreate urban jungle!
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1546
Received: 31/08/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Heather Hall
This appears to be the most suitable location with very good access to the motorway network and will compliment the preferred option for new housing to encourage local employment. It enables development to focus in an area with potential increased capacity to meet employment needs, without encroaching on the Green Belt.