Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Representation ID: 70073
Received: 04/04/2016
Respondent: James Plaskitt
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proposed safeguarded land north of Milverton conflicts with Coventry and Warwick's objectives. In the case of Coventry, the Plan focuses on employment growth. As a result this proposal means that employment growth will not be co-located with housing growth. Warwick's plan seeks to only allocate green field sites where they are located close to areas of employment. This is not the case. Further the site is not appropriate, particularly as Coventry seek to bring forward sites adjacent to the City boundary to avoid in-commuting. The safeguarded area is not appropriate and has not been justified.
See attached