Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Representation ID: 69873
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: Ms. Natalie Matheson
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Representation Summary:
If the main driver for removing the green belt is housing, then why choose somewhere that is not close to the recipient area i.e. Coventry?
No-one working in Coventry will want to live in a congested and difficult commute area.
The proposed location is isolated.
Construction will require huge investment in roads etc. to get people in connection with transportation - thus defeating the purpose.
Full text:
See attached