Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Representation ID: 69598
Received: 21/04/2016
Respondent: Lenco Investments
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Representation Summary:
Two urban extensions for Coventry not justified or supported by work undertaken
No certainty of delivery within plan period
Strategic sites proposed do not appear to bear any relation to the strategic employment growth proposed as part of the Coventry Gateway site.
Number of constraints for both of the identified sites
Land ownership around Kings Hill not represented by consortium.
Issues around access and highways, including need for new link road
Areas subject to flood risk
Full text:
See attached