Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 68663

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Helen Gloster

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to allocation: -
- unaffordable and unworkable transport proposals
- adverse impact on historic environment
- additional housing not now required
- flooding

Full text:

I wish to have my serious concerns and objection noted regarding the proposed New Local Plan for the following reasons:
1. The proposed modifications may address the shortcomings of the local plan which were identified by the Inspector in his letter dated June 2015 which followed his examination dealing primarily with the numbers of houses to be provided in the new plan. That examination did not deal with many other aspects of the plan to which objections were submitted, and the new plan does nothing to address these shortcomings which alone may be considered significant enough to make the plan unsound. Therefore, the original objections still stand and must not be omitted from any further examination of the plan.
2. The unaffordable transport proposals on which the plan was based were subject to serious objections as they were unworkable. The impact of the new development areas (including those permitted under recent planning consents) on transport plans has not been satisfactorily explained or exposed to public scrutiny and, hence, must still be regarded as unsound.
3. The inspector into the appeal against the proposed development at the Asps agreed the importance of ensuring there should be no new development adjoining the Banbury Road on the southern approach to Warwick because of its potential impact on the settings of the Grade 1 listed Warwick Castle Park, the Grade 1 listed Warwick Castle and the Warwick Conservation Area. In the event, the development was permitted by the Secretary of State who, despite accepting the Inspector's view of the importance of these factors, agreed to the development on the basis, principally, that (in the absence of an adopted local plan) satisfying the predicted demand for housing should take precedence. Now, however, the anticipated demand for housing can be met within the new plan and there is the opportunity to plan to safeguard the remaining important open areas from development. For this reason we object to the allocation for housing of the land west of Banbury Road and at the northern end of Gallows Hill, known as "The Strawberry Field." - which would be even more damaging and much of which is, in any case, liable to flooding.
4. The photo below [SEE ORIGINAL E-MAIL] is just an indication of the potential flooding that is going to be a SERIOUS problem for the council if they do not take heed of the advice and warning given.
5. A prime example is the recent flooding which occurred at the Mallory Court traffic lights recently, which I have not seem before but is almost certainly due to the excavations of the housing being built and the flood plain being altered. There were tankers trying to pump out water, and this was only after an averagely bad period of rain. Imagine this scenario on the Gallows Hill with the water flooding down the Banbury Road - CHAOS - even more than it is EVERY day at peak hours.