Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Representation ID: 68571
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Miss Amie Wiberley
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Proposal is unsound because;
Proposed use of green belt land in non exceptional circumstances and not justifying going against government policy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
Extensive flood risk from use of proposed fields, leaving areas of the village susceptible to flooding.
Negative impact on landscape and wildlife, already under threat from the development of HS2.
Impact of a large increase in population on local infrastructure.
Increased traffic on roads, specifically B4453 also possible impact of HS2.
Insufficient provision for increased need for local amenities including, schools and medical care.
Negative impact of increase on a small local community.
Proposal is unsound because;
Proposed use of green belt land in non exceptional circumstances and not justifying going against government policy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
Extensive flood risk from use of proposed fields, leaving areas of the village susceptible to flooding.
Negative impact on landscape and wildlife, already under threat from the development of HS2.
Impact of a large increase in population on local infrastructure.
Increased traffic on roads, specifically B4453 also possible impact of HS2.
Insufficient provision for increased need for local amenities including, schools and medical care.
Negative impact of increase on a small local community.