Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Representation ID: 68382
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd
Agent: Mr Niall Crabb
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
It is considered that the modifications still do not provide for sufficient land to meet the unmet need nor provide for adequate flexibility in meeting future need. There has not been a proper, transparent debate on which sites should be "allocated" which means that there has not been a proper transparent debate on the relative merits of those sites "allocated" and sites which have not.
Land on the edge of Coventry is vital to this process and it is strongly believed that in the study used to allocate/not allocate sites, there are clear flaws in the assessment process
It is considered that the modifications still do not provide for sufficient land to meet the unmet need nor provide for adequate flexibility in meeting future need. There has not been a proper, transparent debate on which sites should be "allocated" which means that there has not been a proper transparent debate on the relative merits of those sites "allocated" and sites which have not.
Land on the edge of Coventry is vital to this process and it is strongly believed that in the study used to allocate/not allocate sites, there are clear flaws in the assessment process