Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 68380

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Agent: Mr Niall Crabb

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

It is considered that the modifications still do not provide for sufficient land to meet the unmet need nor provide for adequate flexibility in meeting future need. The housing demand/need across the wider Region, including Birmingham is growing and this should be reflected by all the Authorities rather than just those in the currently defined SHMAs.

Sites "allocated" are seemingly based on the Sustainability Appraisal Report which has not been the subject of transparent debate. As a result, it is believed that there are clear flaws in the assessment process.

Full text:

No representation is made regarding the calculation and categorisation of housing numbers which will be assessed by others although it is considered that insufficient flexibility has been included to provide for unmet need across the Region.
However, by way of example, the Birmingham Development Plan identifies the need for 37,900 houses to be supplied in Authorities outside its own area. The means by which these are to be supplied is not specified but it is suggested that additional focus is required both in the SHMA AND in neighbouring Authorities. It will NOT be acceptable just to say that discussions are ongoing as a means of complying with the Duty to Cooperate and actually supplying the needed homes.
Of greater concern is that sites are being "allocated" by way of these modifications and seemingly based on the Sustainability Appraisal Report which has not been the subject of transparent debate. As a result, it is believed that there are clear flaws in the assessment process.