Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 68295

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Sophie Dipple

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

I believe that the proposed modifications are unsound because it is unjustified, ineffective and is not consistent with national policy.

There is "lower" value green belt land closer to Coventry that should be used first.

It is unlikely that people who want to live and work in Coventry will want to buy houses on the land North of Milverton and therefore this development proposal will not support Coventry's housing need.

The residents of local towns will be deprived of an area which is highly valued and sustainable for walking, running, cycling, bird watching, and used by local secondary schools for educational walks.

Full text:

I believe that the proposed modifications are unsound because it is unjustified, ineffective and is not consistent with national policy.

The exceptional circumstances required by the national planning policy framework to remove the land North of Milverton from the greenbelt have not been demonstrated by Warwick District Council.

The proposed development is to support Coventry City Council's housing needs. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry that should be used in preference to the land North of Milverton to reduce un-necessary commuting, congestion, and further road construction.

In practice it is unlikely that people who want to live and work in Coventry will want to buy houses on the land North of Milverton and therefore this development proposal will not support Coventry's housing need.

Precedence for releasing land from the green belt required the "value" of potential sites to the green belt to be taken into account and those with the least value to be removed the green belt first. WDC, in cooperation with Coventry City Council, has assessed sites on the edge of Coventry as being of lower green belt value. Even if development at Old Milverton was acceptable as a sustainable location for development, there are sites with lower green belt value that should be used in preference to the land North of Milverton.

The "green" lung between Leamington and Kenilworth will be reduced to less than 1.5 miles.

The picturesque northern gateway to the historic regency town of Royal Leamington Spa will be destroyed.

Highly productive farming land will be lost together with long established wildlife habitat.

The residents of local towns will be deprived of an area which is highly valued and sustainable for walking, running, cycling, riding, bird watching, and is also used by local secondary schools for educational walks.

The proposed park and ride scheme is unsustainable because:
- there will be no dedicated buses, so users will have to coincide visits with the bus timetable.
- The site is too close to Leamington, it would be better if the site was focused on the A46 roundabout with the A452 which could form part of the Thickthorn development, and provide for Leamington, Warwick, Kenilworth, Warwick University, and potentially Coventry.
- Much of the traffic using the A452 crosses to the south of Leamington where there are major employers.
- Shoppers are unlikely to use the park and ride where there is plenty of parking in Leamington.
- Oxford appears to have the only park and ride scheme in the country which really works and this is because there is limited parking in Oxford City Centre.
- There are already a lot of car parks in this area of Green Belt with impervious surfaces all of which reduce the areas ability to absorb rainfall and contribute to flooding.

A railway station is unviable because the railway line is in a deep cutting on Old Milverton making construction impractical.