Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 68287

Received: 16/04/2016

Respondent: Mr John Russell

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Proposed allocation of green belt land north of to satisfy Coventry's housing needs does not satisfy the exceptional circumstances test.
Development will destroy character and amenity of three historic towns, Leamington Spa, Warwick and Kenilworth.
Proposed park & ride scheme North of Milverton is unlikely to be a success because most similar schemes in UK fail, there are no dedicated buses and current parking is adequate in but the busiest three or four shopping days in the year. Business commuters are unlikely to use the P&R service because the bus routes don't easily connect to employment areas in the district.

Full text:

The development plans for houses on green belt land do not meet the exceptional circumstances test required by the National Planning Framework. The fundamental character and amenity of the three historic towns, Leamington Spa, Warwick and Kenilworth is to be destroyed because of a need to meet an unproven overspill need from Coventry.
There are many brown and green field sites in and around Coventry that would be better suited to meeting Coventry's housing needs without releasing local green belt and adding to traffic congestion. Such development would improve the prospects for Coventry's retail businesses, improve the current poor housing stock in Coventry and reduce the need for commuting on the already congested local road network.
The proposal to develop a park and ride facility North of Milverton seems perverse. Such schemes have a poor record nationally and usually only get used if parking in the Town/City served is either limited or highly priced. The alternative sites under consideration include much needed farmland, sloping ground and areas that play an important part in the flood management of the River Avon. The lack of a dedicated bus service will be a further limitation on the success of the P&R scheme.