Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66426
Received: 26/06/2014
Respondent: Roger Warren
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Representation Summary:
The revised development strategy did not include the Common Lane (Crackley Triangle proposal) proposal. This major development has been added to the local plan since then without public consultation.
Objects to development on the site as it is contrary to the objective of the local plan to protect and enhance the natural environment.
Full text:
see attached