Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65934
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Andrew Adams-Green
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Representation Summary:
WDC not proven exceptional circumstances for proposal
There is no regeneration plan of Lillington
Policy DS18 is highly inaccurate
Consultation has been patchy and ineffective
Loss of recreational amenity 'riding school'
No explanation of why brownfield sites could not be used.
Ecological and environmental studies have not been carried out.
Represents only 1.5% of total housing needed but has a huge impact on the landscape.
Full text:
see attached