Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65669
Received: 27/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Edward Walpole-Brown
Agent: Brown and Co
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The vision is inconsistent with the Plan Period. Insufficient evidence has been supplied about the cooperation which has taken place to achieve a Plan that satisfies needs of neighbouring authorities. The Plan as prepared is not consistent entirely with the four key tests of soundness. Plan has been rushed through without the necessary tests being undertaken and that it is premature. Hatton Green / Hatton Park should receive a higher land allocation to reflect evidence of substantial employment needs and out commuting from this area. Insufficient regard has been given to the key strategic priority of supporting sustainable communities and enabling improvements to facilitate key services, such as was indicated in
terms of outlining the benefits of the land at Hatton Green.
See attached