Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 65355

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Martin Teodorczyk

Representation Summary:

This should not detract from my other representations made, specifically about how the Green Belt is not suitable for development as exceptional circumstances do not exist.

However I support the principle that where a site is to be taken out of the Green Belt to facilitate development, settlement boundaries are drawn tightly and decisively to provide a clear distinction between the settlement envelope and the Green Belt.

This will protect the remaining Green Belt more strongly and eliminate ambiguity where Green Belt 'washes over' settlements.

Full text:

This should not detract from my other representations made, specifically about how the Green Belt is not suitable for development as exceptional circumstances do not exist.

However I support the principle that where a site is to be taken out of the Green Belt to facilitate development, settlement boundaries are drawn tightly and decisively to provide a clear distinction between the settlement envelope and the Green Belt.

This will protect the remaining Green Belt more strongly and eliminate ambiguity where Green Belt 'washes over' settlements.