Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 65338
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: Mr Peter Barclay
I support the plan as drafted, as it provides for the use of alternative sites outside of the greenbelt wherever possible. However I am concerned that the recent news in the press regarding Kings Hill may be re-considered as a possible development site for 5,000 homes within the new local plan. This type of development would destroy precious and historic greenbelt land between Coventry and Kenilworth, and would be wholly against the objectives of the plan as currently set out.
I support the plan as drafted, as it provides for the use of alternative sites outside of the greenbelt wherever possible. However I am concerned that the recent news in the press regarding Kings Hill may be re-considered as a possible development site for 5,000 homes within the new local plan. This type of development would destroy precious and historic greenbelt land between Coventry and Kenilworth, and would be wholly against the objectives of the plan as currently set out.