Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 64846

Received: 01/05/2014

Respondent: Roger Speck

Representation Summary:

This proposals would impact on prime agricultural land
It would have a negative impact on the landscape.
Previous objections rgarding access, pavements, bus stops, safety ad inadequate infrastructure still apply
(No convenient access doctors or schools. Few shops close by.
No employment sites/opportunities for travellers. Site prone to flooding. No safe access to road network. Increasing traffic here is unsustainable. No water supply or waste disposal.
Cannot be integrated into the landscape and would adversely affect natural and historic environment eg wildlife and woodlands.Increased pressure on local services.
Using large commercial vehicles/vans is unsustainable. No footpaths, bus stops or waiting areas. Crossing A425 is dangerous. Insufficient infrastructure to support the site.
Site is on Archaeological Register).

People do not want these sites.


Full text:

see attached

Attachments: