Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 64519
Received: 26/05/2014
Respondent: Mr Richard Thwaites
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The preferred option for Hampton Magna was well known before the start of the consultation process, rendering the whole process invalid. The preferred level of growth was ignored and the distribution of growth and proposed housing sites took no notice of overwhelming local objection. 99% of respondents were opposed to the preferred option for development, 92% of the respondents were in favour of the Maple Lodge site being selected as the preferred option for development
The preferred option for Hampton Magna was well known before the start of the consultation process, rendering the whole process invalid. The preferred level of growth was ignored and the distribution of growth and proposed housing sites took no notice of overwhelming local objection. 99% of respondents were opposed to the preferred option for development, 92% of the respondents were in favour of the Maple Lodge site being selected as the preferred option for development