Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 64518

Received: 26/05/2014

Respondent: Mr Richard Thwaites

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Local Plan fails 2 of the 4 tests of soundness.
Justified. The plan should be the most appropriate strategy when considered against reasonable alternatives, based on proportionate evidence.
In Hampton Magna, the preferred option is not the most appropriate, other alternatives are more compliant with NPPF policy and guidelines and the evidence base used was flawed.
Consistent with national policy
NPPF enables local people to be empowered to shape their surroundings, yet Hampton Magna residents objections have been ignored or overruled. Possible use of brownfield land within Hampton Magna has been ignored.

Full text:

The Local Plan fails 2 of the 4 tests of soundness.
Justified. The plan should be the most appropriate strategy when considered against reasonable alternatives, based on proportionate evidence.
In Hampton Magna, the preferred option is not the most appropriate, other alternatives are more compliant with NPPF policy and guidelines and the evidence base used was flawed.
Consistent with national policy
NPPF enables local people to be empowered to shape their surroundings, yet Hampton Magna residents objections have been ignored or overruled. Possible use of brownfield land within Hampton Magna has been ignored.