Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 64300

Received: 01/05/2014

Respondent: Merle Mason

Representation Summary:

Site has already had three previous proposals rejected by the Planning Officers and subsequently also on appeal as it is in the Green Belt and not suitable for the change of use put forward by the owner it seems to me that it should have been included in the RED CLASSIFICATION as it seems very similier to the Kites Nest Site which was also the subject of two public enquiries and rejected as unsuitable development.

Full text:

I support the oblections laid out by HOTHRA in connection with the above mentioned site at Hampton on the Hill.
It would appear to me from reading their submission that this site has already had three previous proposals rejected by the Planning Officers and subsequently also on appeal as it is in the Green Belt and not suitable for the change of use put forward by the owner it seems to me that it should have been included in the RED CLASSIFICATION as it seems very similier to the Kites Nest Site which was also the subject of two public enquiries and rejected as unsuitable development.