Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 47377
Received: 01/08/2012
Respondent: Crackley Residents Association
The terminology "peri-urban park" needs to be reconsidered. CRA would vociferously oppose the "downgrading" of the vitally important Greenbelt of the Crackley Gap to support a park facility that might adversely affect its characteristic nature. Detailed consideration of ecological, landscape and other amenity implications against social benefits needs to be undertaken. CRA is happy to be involved in the future development of this GI enhancement.
The terminology "peri-urban park" needs to be reconsidered. CRA would vociferously oppose the "downgrading" of the vitally important Greenbelt of the Crackley Gap to support a park facility that might adversely affect its characteristic nature. Detailed consideration of ecological, landscape and other amenity implications against social benefits needs to be undertaken. CRA is happy to be involved in the future development of this GI enhancement.