Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Representation ID: 45000

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Mrs Judy Cobham

Representation Summary:

These proposals go a long way towards addressing the very real concerns that so many of us raised about the prime arable land south of Harbury Lane.

These are distributed around the district and are not liable to flood.

Wherever possible brownfield land should be developed first - to be put into productive use and agricultural land can be used to feed people.

Full text:

Having attended, and spoken at various of your presentation on the core strategy last year, I wanted to thank you for coming up with the alternatives sites. These proposals go a long way towards addressing the very real concerns that so many of us raised about the prime arable land south of Harbury Lane.

The alternative sites distribute the housing around the Warwick-Kenilworth-Leamington area, integrating it into already established communities, with consequently less infrastructure impact. Nor are any of the proposed alternatives ( so far as I am aware) prone to flooding in the way that the Harbury Lane south site is.

My final request would be that wherever possible you look to develop brownfield land first. I realise that this requires more effort in terms of ground clearance and decontamination prior to use, but the social benefits are correspondingly greater. Derelict eyesore sites are improved and brought back into productive use and agricultural land can continue in its prime purpose of feeding people with trusted locally-sourced products.