Support

Alternative Sites Consultation

Representation ID: 44007

Received: 08/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Representation Summary:

The entire site is not appropriate for full development. However, the Joint Greenbelt Review identifies the area as one of low landscape value, owing to the airport, business parks and previous development. It appears sensible to use this site to take pressure away from King's Hill. Owing to its role in providing Coventry overflow, I would expect it to be demonstrated that no land at Coventry was available prior to development.

Full text:

The entire site is not appropriate for full development. However, the Joint Greenbelt Review identifies the area as one of low landscape value, owing to the airport, business parks and previous development. It appears sensible to use this site to take pressure away from King's Hill. Owing to its role in providing Coventry overflow, I would expect it to be demonstrated that no land at Coventry was available prior to development.