Object
Alternative Sites Consultation
Representation ID: 43914
Received: 06/04/2010
Respondent: Susan and Michael Broadbent
We believe there are strong environmental arguments why no development should be permitted in the Crackley Gap.
If any consideration is to be given to permitting any future development on Hurst Farm land, then we take it that the authorities will ensure the fullest EIA is undertaken in conformity with all legal requirements, and that the general public will be consulted at all stages in the process.
We believe there are strong environmental arguments why no development should be permitted in the Crackley Gap.
If any consideration is to be given to permitting any future development on Hurst Farm land, then we take it that the authorities will ensure the fullest EIA is undertaken in conformity with all legal requirements, and that the general public will be consulted at all stages in the process.
We look forward to being kept fully informed by the authorities on the devepments relating to proposals and any future changes in the status of land in the Crackley Gap.