Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Representation ID: 43914

Received: 06/04/2010

Respondent: Susan and Michael Broadbent

Representation Summary:

We believe there are strong environmental arguments why no development should be permitted in the Crackley Gap.

If any consideration is to be given to permitting any future development on Hurst Farm land, then we take it that the authorities will ensure the fullest EIA is undertaken in conformity with all legal requirements, and that the general public will be consulted at all stages in the process.

Full text:

We believe there are strong environmental arguments why no development should be permitted in the Crackley Gap.

If any consideration is to be given to permitting any future development on Hurst Farm land, then we take it that the authorities will ensure the fullest EIA is undertaken in conformity with all legal requirements, and that the general public will be consulted at all stages in the process.

We look forward to being kept fully informed by the authorities on the devepments relating to proposals and any future changes in the status of land in the Crackley Gap.