Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Representation ID: 43596

Received: 06/04/2010

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Cox

Representation Summary:

1. The traffic flows at peak hours cannot accommodate existing traffic so would not be able to accommodate the increased traffic
2. The development extends almost to the boundary of Leek Wootton which goes against the Council's existing policy of keeping the large villages distinctive
3. The general infrastructure; school/shops argument that applies to enlargement of Leek Wootton applies here also
4. The site south of the A46 is prone to flooding
5. The strategy already has enough locations for housing taking into account the regional (i.e. growth of Coventry South) district

Full text:

1. The traffic flows at peak hours cannot accommodate existing traffic so would not be able to accommodate the increased traffic
2. The development extends almost to the boundary of Leek Wootton which goes against the Council's existing policy of keeping the large villages distinctive
3. The general infrastructure; school/shops argument that applies to enlargement of Leek Wootton applies here also
4. The site south of the A46 is prone to flooding
5. The strategy already has enough locations for housing taking into account the regional (i.e. growth of Coventry South) district