Yes

ID sylw: 93389

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93476

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93478

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr G Wyatt

This could be very helpful if sympathetically carried out.

Yes

ID sylw: 93716

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, with a request that the policy incorporates the WDC Biodiversity Action programme and the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust strategy (https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-08/WWT%20Strategy%202030_final.pdf)

Yes

ID sylw: 93823

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray

Fully support

Yes

ID sylw: 93831

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick District Green Party

Yes. As the LNRS is a statutory requirement this is non-negotiable. However, LNRS for the Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull is still in preparation. The next iteration of the draft of the plan should take account of the emerging strategy and ensure that its provisions are hard-wired into the plan. This draft policy direction should also build on the WDC Biodiversity Action Programme and the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Strategy
(https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-08/WWT%20Strategy%202030_final.pdf )

Yes

ID sylw: 94127

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

There should also be attention paid to the areas where nature is already flourishing to ensure biodiversity is being further encouraged and protected in surrounding areas that act as wildlife corridors

Yes

ID sylw: 94128

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kelly

The priority should be preserving and enhancing existing biodiversity and supporting it in areas it’s already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats.

Yes

ID sylw: 94148

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Holly Whittaker

I agree with the draft policy regarding the Local Nature Recovery Strategy. However, I am concerned at the lack of detail contained within this policy about such an important issue, and believe this should be expanded upon further.

We need to enhance the biodiversity that already exists in South Warwickshire, and support it in areas where it's already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats.

No

ID sylw: 94380

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Blandamer

The policy says 'expected to support the principles' and this wording isn't strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed. Need to be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists and supporting it in areas it's already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats.

No

ID sylw: 94654

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Renny Wodynska

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 94945

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Yes, we should be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists and supporting in areas thiving with birds, bees and all wildlife.

Yes

ID sylw: 95061

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Grimes

It is good to enhance the existing habitats.

Yes

ID sylw: 95243

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

‘expected to support the principles’ gives an option to ignore the principles. Could the wording be amended to deliver an enforceable Policy?

No

ID sylw: 95264

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 95335

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

Yes should be protecting and improving the existing environment rather than seeking to cause harm to it

No

ID sylw: 95336

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kristina Tristram

No. The policy says 'expected to support the principles' and this wording isnt strong enough. If councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

No

ID sylw: 95469

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cuff

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

No

ID sylw: 95524

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Freeman

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If
the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as
stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 95865

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

Should be enhancing and supporting the biodiversity areas that already exists

Yes

ID sylw: 95964

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes

No

ID sylw: 96084

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Tamsin Kashap

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

No

ID sylw: 96123

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosemary Collier

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 96360

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

No

ID sylw: 96471

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Ledger

Why only 30%. Green belt is currently teeming with wildlife which will have nowhere to go through the destruction of prime habitats. In the era where we are now aware of the impacts humanity has on the environment, we should seek to protect and enhance existing habitats. The plans proposed do not do that. Noise and light pollution will further frighten wildlife away from the area

Yes

ID sylw: 96542

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

yes

Yes

ID sylw: 96623

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

Yes agree

Yes

ID sylw: 96686

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Gee

Not sure how you are going to achieve it though as nature requires undisturbed space to recover ,and to thrive, and this plan is significantly reducing the amount of land available to support this policy

Yes

ID sylw: 96965

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 97074

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).