No

ID sylw: 90337

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Julia Gibson

The policy says 'expected to support the principles' and this wording isn't strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as per the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 90448

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

The strategy should aim to enhance existing biodiversity by supporting it in the areas in which it is already thriving.

No

ID sylw: 90600

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Pack

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 90749

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Goodwin

We must enhance the biodiversity that already exists and not destroy it by building on greenbelt land. We should support it in areas it’s already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well-established habitats such as the Clopton Corner part of SQ18 adjacent to the Welcome Hills.

Yes

ID sylw: 90883

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Morris

The focus should be on enhancing and supporting the biodiversity that already exists. This involves reinforcing wildlife corridors and well-established habitats where biodiversity is thriving. By doing so, we can create a more connected and resilient ecosystem, allowing species to move freely and access resources. This approach not only conserves existing biodiversity but also promotes its growth and adaptation to changing environmental conditions. It is essential to prioritise areas with high biodiversity potential and ensure that conservation efforts are sustainable and effective. By working together with nature, we can build a healthier and more vibrant ecosystem for future generations.

Yes

ID sylw: 90905

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Emma Barber

The primary objective should be to enhance and support the existing biodiversity. This entails reinforcing wildlife corridors and well-established habitats where biodiversity flourishes. By doing so, we can construct a more interconnected and resilient ecosystem, enabling species to move freely and access resources. This approach not only safeguards existing biodiversity but also fosters its growth and adaptation to evolving environmental conditions. It is crucial to prioritise areas with high biodiversity potential and ensure that conservation efforts are sustainable and effective. Collaborating with nature allows us to construct a healthier and more vibrant ecosystem for future generations.

Yes

ID sylw: 90935

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jason Lupton

As set out with the introduction of the Environmental Act and legality of developments providing a net gain, the highest scores available are for existing retained habitats. These should be protected as much as possible.
Existing wildlife corridors and established habitats should be the priority.

Yes

ID sylw: 91210

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions. It is vital that South Warwickshire actively engage with local environmental groups and charites to make this policy effective.

No

ID sylw: 91388

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Norman Thomas

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

No

ID sylw: 91397

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed. Actual commitments to biodiversity rather lip service to regulations are needed.

No

ID sylw: 91514

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mary Adams

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 91550

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comment

Yes

ID sylw: 91711

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

ID sylw: 91787

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

N/A

No

ID sylw: 91818

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tim Burridge

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 91861

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hanno Kirner

Protecting existing green areas a priority

No

ID sylw: 92107

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dee McGowan

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Other

ID sylw: 92153

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Patricia Scott

What exactly is "will be expected to support the principles of LNRS" supposed to mean? Developers don't have any interest in supporting either nature recovery or climate change mitigation. At Meon Vale, in mitigation for the loss of several bat roosts, a bat house was built in a location which was totally inappropriate and of a size and design that was totally inadequate. Developers will always do the absolute minimum that they can get away with, with zero regard for nature recovery.

Yes

ID sylw: 92227

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

We should be prioritising and enhancing biodiversity, with native species in the UK struggling, due to human development and impact, we have a moral obligation to support our nature and wildlife and ensuring wildlife corridors are kept open and we should limit disrupting established habitats.

Yes

ID sylw: 92306

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr G Wyatt

So long as they ADD to the networks rather than replacing or reducing by removal of existing 'nature' and resources.

Yes

ID sylw: 92430

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Christine Slaughter

We should be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists.

Yes

ID sylw: 92498

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 92650

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

Agree areas need protection especially green belt and scientific interest bio diverse habitats

Yes

ID sylw: 92698

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Briggs

Agreed, but lacking in detail. As an example, the large area of land without roads that backs onto Kenilworth Castle (of which SG04 forms a part) must be protected and not reduced in any way. Migration routes, unaffected by roads, which are extensive in area are known to enable animal and bird populations to increase.

No

ID sylw: 92722

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Luke Kempton

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 92825

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

It is far better to preserve existing biodiversity than expect the recreation of this through mitigation, which is unlikely. Preserving wild areas is essential for biodiversity and allowing these areas to naturally adapt to climate change without further human disturbance is preferable.

Yes

ID sylw: 93000

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Biodiversity should be enhanced not reduced or removed. Wildlife is already under pressure so we should protect what we already have.

Yes

ID sylw: 93034

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

100% support

Yes

ID sylw: 93199

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Martina Hunt

South Warwickshire should be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists, and supporting it in areas it's already showing to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats. There is a group of resident deer in the fields of SG18, which has grown from three to seven in the last five years, they have a relatively safe corridor towards the Welcombe Hills currently, but these deer would be impacted directly by the development, as they live in a small wood in the middle of the proposed development. Buzzards, kites and owls live in and around this site too.

No

ID sylw: 93325

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr geoff marston

The policy wording isn’t strong enough. ‘expected to support the principles’ should be rephrased 'must support' . If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030 (Environment Act 2021) then much more ambitious targets are needed.