BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86012
Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Kate Harris
All parties should be expected to follow this policy approach
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86125
Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86700
Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater
But - Make it stronger.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86761
Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Dane
The plan needs a policy on protecting/providing wildlife corridors
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86946
Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
Protect local nature - don't build on it
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87060
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless
This must be part of any building from the start, intense surveys carried out and plans for how any disruption to nature will be mitigated. This also needs to be inspected by the council and fines/legal action taken where housing companies do not fulfil there promises.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87096
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: S Gardner
This policy challenges some of your growth areas like sg01 which covers a large area of green land and runs into the kenilworth to bale all common green way… the policy needs to more effectively applied to your plans please.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87429
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day
None
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87603
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
I agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88542
Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Kathryn Lawry Kennedy
As the LNRS is a statutory requirement this is non-negotiable. However, LNRS for the Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull is still in preparation. The next iteration of the draft of the plan should take account of the emerging strategy and ensure that its provisions are hard-wired into the plan. This draft policy direction should also build on the WDC Biodiversity Action Programme and the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Strategy
(https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-08/WWT%20Strategy%202030_final.pdf )
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88800
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Erin Williams
Yes. As the LNRS is a statutory requirement this is non-negotiable. However, LNRS for the Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull is still in preparation. The next iteration of the draft of the plan should take account of the emerging strategy and ensure that its provisions are hard-wired into the plan. This draft policy direction should also build on the WDC Biodiversity Action Programme and the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Strategy
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88846
Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88868
Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Lucy Hartley
good
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89093
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
i agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89171
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth
but the green belt land should not be built on regardless, then there is not a need for a local nature recovery strategy
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89219
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanna Hughes
biodiversity that already exists should be enhanced, we shouldn't be taking it away in areas it’s already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89281
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jon Knight
Having developments provide areas of enhanced biodiversity as part of their site and connecting existing ecological niches together is a great idea.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89428
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Hayles
n/a
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89572
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton
Make sure this is hardwired into the plan and use recommendations from the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust - https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-08/WWT%20Strategy%202030_final.pdf
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89641
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Simon Cook
Again I find myself in complete agreement with the local Wildlife Trust. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89872
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Emily Buxton-Woodcock
No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed. Stop destroying our planet.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89897
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Stephen Browett
I agree with the sentiment but this is worryingly light on detail.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89929
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr O Johnson
No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90024
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Fiona Macvie
Existing biodiversity should be protected and enhanced especially where habitats are well established.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90069
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson
The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90131
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline Temple
In principle the approach sounds good but at the moment, there's little detail. It's extremely important that nature is protected and that it is accessible to local communities
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90199
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Hind
We should be looking to improve and protect areas where we have areas where we are lucky enough to have biodiverse land. eg Welcome Hills and surrounding green belt land
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90261
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Maria Giblin
We should be supporting biodiversity and those thriving with wildlife and habitats
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90262
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Giblin
It should be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists and supporting it in areas it’s already shown to be thriving, with existing wildlife corridors and well-established habitats providing a strong foundation. By focusing on these areas, we can help to create a more resilient and sustainable ecosystem for the future.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90316
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Liz Stone
The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.