Baginton and Bubbenhall Neighbourhood Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 70788

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Any associated improvements to access to the highway will be subject to detail consultation with the Highway Authority. This includes any impact to existing road networks or introducing new or increasing existing public and community transport.

Support

Representation ID: 70789

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Policy G5 Additional Business Premises and Employment Opportunities The County Council supports the proposals contained in the Neighbourhood Plan, in principle, subject to both planning and transport planning criteria being met.

Support

Representation ID: 70790

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Policy BAG1 & BAG2
The County Council supports the emphasis given to cycling and walking. Walking and cycling opportunities should also be identified in new developments.

Support

Representation ID: 70791

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Policy BAG5 Protecting Local Services, Assets and Amenities The County Council supports the proposals under Policy BAG5 in principle, subject to both planning and transport planning criteria being met.

Comment

Representation ID: 70792

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Policy BUB3 Provision and Protection of Facilities and Services
Further details would be required regarding the accessibility of individual sites before
commenting further.

Support

Representation ID: 70793

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Policy G1: Protecting and Enhancing Local Landscape Character
We are supportive of the points made in 4.12 - 4.14 and G1 in relation to flood risk.

Support

Representation ID: 70794

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Policy G6: Managing flood risk
We are support all three points in G6, and recommend an additional point is included
on the use of appropriate SUDs in all new developments.

Comment

Representation ID: 70795

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

It is strongly recommended that a point is added to BAG2 to reflect the points made
in the above 2 sections,

Comment

Representation ID: 70796

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

BAG1 and BUB2 could include a point on the need for suitable above ground SUDs providing attenuation to greenfield runoff rates.

Comment

Representation ID: 70797

Received: 20/07/2017

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

BAG1 and BUB2 could include a point on the need for suitable above ground SUDs providing attenuation to greenfield runoff rates.