Proposed Modifications January 2016

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Parklands Consortium Ltd search

New search

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 2 - Para 2.6

Representation ID: 68989

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 3 - Policy DS4

Representation ID: 69287

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 4 - Policy DS6

Representation ID: 69288

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 5 - para 2.20

Representation ID: 69289

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 6 - Policy DS7

Representation ID: 69290

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 7 - paras 2.21 to 2.24

Representation ID: 69291

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 8 - Policy DS10

Representation ID: 69292

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 9 - paras 2.37 and 2.38

Representation ID: 69293

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod PM36 - Policies Map

Representation ID: 69295

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

H43 - Kings Hill Lane

Representation ID: 69296

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.