Proposed Modifications January 2016
Search representations
Results for Grevayne Properties Ltd search
New searchObject
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 4 - Policy DS6
Representation ID: 69878
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Grevayne Properties Ltd
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Housing requirement does not take account of unmet arising from Birmingham. Given Warwick's geographical relationship to Birmingham, it is inevitable that some of the additional unmet housing demand will need to be accommodated within Warwick. Further, the latest 5 year housing land supply position published by the Council does not take in to account Coventry's shortfalls, let alone any further shortfall arising from Birmingham. It also applies a 5% non implementation rate, when a 10% rate would be more realistic It is therefore clear that the housing target needs to be increased to deal with historic undersupply and the required buffer.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 6 - Policy DS7
Representation ID: 69977
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Grevayne Properties Ltd
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
DS7 provides for a buffer of 801 dwellings or 4.5%. This is sufficient to deal only with minor changes in demand or supply. The allocations need to be increased as a result. Further, the latest 5 year housing land supply position published by the Council does not take in to account Coventry's shortfalls, let alone any further shortfall arising from Birmingham. It is therefore clear that the delivery of housing needs to be increased to deal with historic undersupply and the required buffer.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 10 - Policy DS11
Representation ID: 69978
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Grevayne Properties Ltd
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
ADDITIONAL SITE
The allocation of additional sites such as at Rising Lane, Baddesley Clinton for housing would provide additional dwellings to contribute towards meeting the increased housing target and is small enough to make a contribution to the immediate housing supply such as to deal with the historic undersupply. The development of this site would effectively infill a vacant area of land that is well related to the adjacent existing development. As a consequence it is not considered that the development of the site would prevent the Green Belt from serving the five purposes identified in the NPPF. Further there would be any significant visual impacts. Baddesley Clinton is sustainably located with some facilities including a bus route. Smaller settlements such as Bedddesley Clinton will need to take a share to accommodate the level of housing growth required.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 17
Representation ID: 69979
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Grevayne Properties Ltd
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Mod 17 states that there would be a full or partial review of the plan if changing circumstances could not be accommodated within the existing strategy. The current
strategy to provide a 4.5% buffer would therefore only be sufficient to deal with minor changes to the in demand or supply restrictions and as such
See attached
Support
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 10 - Policy DS11
Representation ID: 69980
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Grevayne Properties Ltd
Agent: Cerda Planning Ltd
Grevayne Properties Ltd are fully supportive of modifications 10 and 11 relating to Appendix B which collectively seeks to allocate additional housing land.
See attached