Proposed Modifications January 2016
Search representations
Results for Save Warwick search
New searchObject
Proposed Modifications January 2016
Mod 10 - Policy DS11
Representation ID: 68825
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Save Warwick
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Modifications only address shortcomings. Impact of developments (including Asps / Gallows Hill) on transport plans not publically explored. Examination process will be flawed unless the next stage of examination
a) takes account of previous objections
b) How changes address concerns of representors
Development increases traffic, pollution levels (already at illegal levels), congestion and delay through Warwick. New plan increases traffic without mitigation.
Anticipated demand can be met within new plan. LPA should safeguard important heritage areas (see inspector's report into The Asps and Gallows Hill).
Object to "Strawberry Field" allocation (liable to flooding) - development more damaging than the Asps.
See attached
Object
Proposed Modifications January 2016
H46A - Gallows Hill
Representation ID: 69739
Received: 22/04/2016
Respondent: Save Warwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Strawberry Fields should be excluded: -
- should be no new development adjoining Banbury Road because of impact on Castle, Park and Conservation Area
- English Heritage objected to original application
- new plan can cater for the anticipated demand for housing elsewhere in the District. LPA should take note of inspector's /English Heritage comments and safeguard important heritage areas of Warwick from further harm
- site liable to flooding
- site makes important contribution to maintaining the remaining rural approach to Warwick and context of castle and its surroundings
See attached