Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries

Object

Representation ID: 61369

Received: 20/01/2014

Respondent: Federal Mogul

Agent: Pro Vision

-Risks pedestrian safety with the need to cross the Southam Road to access the main village and services.
-Church Lane is unable to accommodate an increase in traffic. Such an increase in traffic would also compromise safety at Southam Road/Off Church Lane junction.
-The site can only deliver 100 dwellings wihich is less than Radford's requirement identified as 150.

Object

Representation ID: 61618

Received: 20/01/2014

Respondent: Federal Mogul

Agent: Pro Vision

Site 4 should be the preferred option for the following reasons:
-It provides good and safe foot access to the main village and its facilities.
-There have been no highway objections to development on the site and multiple points of potential access exist.
-Should Site 4 be developed, the landowner also owns 27 hectares adjacent to the site which they propose would be made available as open space that would be permanently managed and maintained.
-Development to the southeast of Radford Semele would not reduce the gap with Sydenham.

Object

Representation ID: 61620

Received: 20/01/2014

Respondent: Federal Mogul

Agent: Pro Vision

-Previous consultations highlighted considerable opposition to development in the Green Belt especially where alternative locations south of Warwick and Leamington Spa, which are outside of the Green Belt, are available. This is consistent with the NPPF (paragraphs 79-89).
-Support concentrating more development in areas outside of the green belt but the balance of development that is proposed to the north of Warwick and Leamington Spa, which is also located within the Green Belt, and that proposed to the south of these settlements, which is located outside of the Green Belt is questionable.

Support

Representation ID: 61935

Received: 20/01/2014

Respondent: Federal Mogul

Agent: Pro Vision

-Support the identification of Radford Semele as a Primary Service Village.

Object

Representation ID: 63334

Received: 20/01/2014

Respondent: Federal Mogul

Agent: Pro Vision

-Less development should be allocated to the more sensitive parts of the District, such as the Primary Service Centres at Cubbington, Hampton Magna, and Lapworth. The allocation of new housing to all Secondary Service Centres in the Green Belt such as Hatton Park, Leek Wootton and Bagington should also be removed or significantly reduced.
-Development should be concentrated in areas outside of the Green Belt.