Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for Crackley Residents Association search
New searchSupport
Preferred Options
PO3: Broad Location of Growth
Representation ID: 47374
Received: 01/08/2012
Respondent: Crackley Residents Association
CRA is broadly supportive of development that is concentrated within and on the edge of existing urban areas.
CRA is broadly supportive of development that is concentrated within and on the edge of existing urban areas.
Support
Preferred Options
Thickthorn
Representation ID: 47375
Received: 01/08/2012
Respondent: Crackley Residents Association
CRA is largely supportive of the proposed development of the land at Thickthorn, but would appreciate some consideration being given within the Local Plan to potential sites for relocation of Kenilworth RFC and The Wardens.
CRA is largely supportive of the proposed development of the land at Thickthorn, but would appreciate some consideration being given within the Local Plan to potential sites for relocation of Kenilworth RFC and The Wardens.
Object
Preferred Options
A.
Representation ID: 47376
Received: 01/08/2012
Respondent: Crackley Residents Association
The loss of Greenbelt is regrettable, but CRA acknowledges that given the development need over a 15 years period, this is inevitable. The reversion of the Crackley Triangle back into the Greenbelt should however be included.
The loss of Greenbelt is regrettable, but CRA acknowledges that given the development need over a 15 years period, this is inevitable. The reversion of the Crackley Triangle back into the Greenbelt should however be included.
Object
Preferred Options
Warwick District Green Infrastructure Delivery Assessment 2012
Representation ID: 47377
Received: 01/08/2012
Respondent: Crackley Residents Association
The terminology "peri-urban park" needs to be reconsidered. CRA would vociferously oppose the "downgrading" of the vitally important Greenbelt of the Crackley Gap to support a park facility that might adversely affect its characteristic nature. Detailed consideration of ecological, landscape and other amenity implications against social benefits needs to be undertaken. CRA is happy to be involved in the future development of this GI enhancement.
The terminology "peri-urban park" needs to be reconsidered. CRA would vociferously oppose the "downgrading" of the vitally important Greenbelt of the Crackley Gap to support a park facility that might adversely affect its characteristic nature. Detailed consideration of ecological, landscape and other amenity implications against social benefits needs to be undertaken. CRA is happy to be involved in the future development of this GI enhancement.
