Alternative Sites Consultation
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchComment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 44346
Received: 09/04/2010
Respondent: Historic England
The evident significance of the adjacent Stoneleigh Abbey and designated Glasshouse
Roman settlement and the potential for further archaeology should be carefully considered.
The specific function of the green belt in the separation of settlements and providing a natural setting to historic places should be acknowledged where relevant to all these sites.
Thank you for consulting English Heritage on the suggested additional six strategic sites.
Before any commitment to any strategic site is made there is an expectation that a thorough strategic environmental assessment/sustainability appraisal will have been undertaken and that evidence would have been gathered and applied to demonstrate the relative suitability, capacity, deliverability and consistency with matters such as regional (RSS QE 1, 5 and 6) and national planning policy has been determined. At present whether or not this has occurred is unclear. In this respect we refer you to our previous correspondence of 25 September 2009, our specific comments relating to the evidence base and also to the recently published PPS5 and its associated good practice guide.
Please note that English Heritage considers that this apparent shortcoming is fundamental to the soundness of the Core Strategy.
In addition to this generic maxim please find an initial observation on each site based, unfortunately, on a rather crude desk top consideration.
Site 1 -Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club and Woodside Training centre
The evident significance of the adjacent Stoneleigh Abbey and designated Glasshouse
Roman settlement and the potential for further archaeology should be carefully considered.
The specific function of the green belt in the separation of settlements and providing a natural setting to historic places should be acknowledged where relevant to all these sites.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 44347
Received: 09/04/2010
Respondent: Historic England
The evident significance of the adjacent Stoneleigh Abbey and designated Glasshouse
Roman settlement and the potential for further archaeology should be carefully considered.
The specific function of the green belt in the separation of settlements and providing a natural setting to historic places should be acknowledged where relevant to all these sites.
Thank you for consulting English Heritage on the suggested additional six strategic sites.
Before any commitment to any strategic site is made there is an expectation that a thorough strategic environmental assessment/sustainability appraisal will have been undertaken and that evidence would have been gathered and applied to demonstrate the relative suitability, capacity, deliverability and consistency with matters such as regional (RSS QE 1, 5 and 6) and national planning policy has been determined. At present whether or not this has occurred is unclear. In this respect we refer you to our previous correspondence of 25 September 2009, our specific comments relating to the evidence base and also to the recently published PPS5 and its associated good practice guide.
Please note that English Heritage considers that this apparent shortcoming is fundamental to the soundness of the Core Strategy.
In addition to this generic maxim please find an initial observation on each site based, unfortunately, on a rather crude desk top consideration.
Site 1 -Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club and Woodside Training centre
The evident significance of the adjacent Stoneleigh Abbey and designated Glasshouse
Roman settlement and the potential for further archaeology should be carefully considered.
The specific function of the green belt in the separation of settlements and providing a natural setting to historic places should be acknowledged where relevant to all these sites.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?
Representation ID: 44348
Received: 09/04/2010
Respondent: Historic England
The Historic Environment Record and County Council's Historic Landscape Characterisation project may prove to be of particular use in establishing the historic significance of these sites. Certainly due to the limited specific designations the broader historic value and the wider landscape setting should be investigated.
Thank you for consulting English Heritage on the suggested additional six strategic sites.
Before any commitment to any strategic site is made there is an expectation that a thorough strategic environmental assessment/sustainability appraisal will have been undertaken and that evidence would have been gathered and applied to demonstrate the relative suitability, capacity, deliverability and consistency with matters such as regional (RSS QE 1, 5 and 6) and national planning policy has been determined. At present whether or not this has occurred is unclear. In this respect we refer you to our previous correspondence of 25 September 2009, our specific comments relating to the evidence base and also to the recently published PPS5 and its associated good practice guide.
Please note that English Heritage considers that this apparent shortcoming is fundamental to the soundness of the Core Strategy.
In addition to this generic maxim please find an initial observation on each site based, unfortunately, on a rather crude desk top consideration.
Site 2, 3 and 5 - Land at Campion School, Glebe Farm and Hurst Farm South
The Historic Environment Record and County Council's Historic Landscape Characterisation project may prove to be of particular use in establishing the historic significance of these sites. Certainly due to the limited specific designations the broader historic value and the wider landscape setting should be investigated.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Glebe Farm, Cubbington?
Representation ID: 44349
Received: 09/04/2010
Respondent: Historic England
The Historic Environment Record and County Council's Historic Landscape Characterisation project may prove to be of particular use in establishing the historic significance of these sites. Certainly due to the limited specific designations the broader historic value and the wider landscape setting should be investigated.
Thank you for consulting English Heritage on the suggested additional six strategic sites.
Before any commitment to any strategic site is made there is an expectation that a thorough strategic environmental assessment/sustainability appraisal will have been undertaken and that evidence would have been gathered and applied to demonstrate the relative suitability, capacity, deliverability and consistency with matters such as regional (RSS QE 1, 5 and 6) and national planning policy has been determined. At present whether or not this has occurred is unclear. In this respect we refer you to our previous correspondence of 25 September 2009, our specific comments relating to the evidence base and also to the recently published PPS5 and its associated good practice guide.
Please note that English Heritage considers that this apparent shortcoming is fundamental to the soundness of the Core Strategy.
In addition to this generic maxim please find an initial observation on each site based, unfortunately, on a rather crude desk top consideration.
Site 2, 3 and 5 - Land at Campion School, Glebe Farm and Hurst Farm South
The Historic Environment Record and County Council's Historic Landscape Characterisation project may prove to be of particular use in establishing the historic significance of these sites. Certainly due to the limited specific designations the broader historic value and the wider landscape setting should be investigated.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?
Representation ID: 44350
Received: 09/04/2010
Respondent: Historic England
The Historic Environment Record and County Council's Historic Landscape Characterisation project may prove to be of particular use in establishing the historic significance of these sites. Certainly due to the limited specific designations the broader historic value and the wider landscape setting should be investigated.
Thank you for consulting English Heritage on the suggested additional six strategic sites.
Before any commitment to any strategic site is made there is an expectation that a thorough strategic environmental assessment/sustainability appraisal will have been undertaken and that evidence would have been gathered and applied to demonstrate the relative suitability, capacity, deliverability and consistency with matters such as regional (RSS QE 1, 5 and 6) and national planning policy has been determined. At present whether or not this has occurred is unclear. In this respect we refer you to our previous correspondence of 25 September 2009, our specific comments relating to the evidence base and also to the recently published PPS5 and its associated good practice guide.
Please note that English Heritage considers that this apparent shortcoming is fundamental to the soundness of the Core Strategy.
In addition to this generic maxim please find an initial observation on each site based, unfortunately, on a rather crude desk top consideration.
Site 2, 3 and 5 - Land at Campion School, Glebe Farm and Hurst Farm South
The Historic Environment Record and County Council's Historic Landscape Characterisation project may prove to be of particular use in establishing the historic significance of these sites. Certainly due to the limited specific designations the broader historic value and the wider landscape setting should be investigated.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?
Representation ID: 44351
Received: 09/04/2010
Respondent: Historic England
Thorough evidence needs to be applied to determine whether the proposal would adversely affect the significance of the historic landscape and its setting. The impacts of major development on the individual components that determine the relative value of Guy's Cliffe in total should be understood.
English Heritage considers that the well preserved areas of ridge and furrow should certainly be regarded as of national importance and preserved as a consequence.
Nevertheless, should a robust assessment of the landscape establish that some form of development may be appropriate there should be an expectation that change will lever an enhancement of the historic environment.
Thank you for consulting English Heritage on the suggested additional six strategic sites.
Before any commitment to any strategic site is made there is an expectation that a thorough strategic environmental assessment/sustainability appraisal will have been undertaken and that evidence would have been gathered and applied to demonstrate the relative suitability, capacity, deliverability and consistency with matters such as regional (RSS QE 1, 5 and 6) and national planning policy has been determined. At present whether or not this has occurred is unclear. In this respect we refer you to our previous correspondence of 25 September 2009, our specific comments relating to the evidence base and also to the recently published PPS5 and its associated good practice guide.
Please note that English Heritage considers that this apparent shortcoming is fundamental to the soundness of the Core Strategy.
In addition to this generic maxim please find an initial observation on each site based, unfortunately, on a rather crude desk top consideration.
Site 4 - Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick
You should ensure that thorough evidence is applied to determine whether the proposal would adversely affect the significance of the designated historic landscape and its setting including key views in and out. The direct and indirect impacts of major new development on the individual components that determine the relative value of Guy's Cliffe in total should be understood.
English Heritage considers that the well preserved areas of ridge and furrow should certainly be regarded as of national importance and preserved as a consequence, see:-
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/upload/pdf/turning_plough.pdf?1267377944
Nevertheless and without prejudice to the above principle, should a robust assessment of the landscape establish that some form of development may be appropriate there should be an expectation that change will lever an enhancement of the historic environment in accordance with PPS1 1(ix) and PPS5.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?
Representation ID: 44352
Received: 09/04/2010
Respondent: Historic England
This substantial area of proposed development includes designated and undesignated historic assets of great significance. Before any principle is established a specific historic environment assessment must be undertaken to fully understand the landscapes special historic interest, the locations of particular historic significance and sensitivity and the areas subsequent capacity to accommodate change and where this might take place and what form it might take.
It is important to understand the value of the historic landscape as a whole, its setting and integrity and not just the individual cultural highlights.
Thank you for consulting English Heritage on the suggested additional six strategic sites.
Before any commitment to any strategic site is made there is an expectation that a thorough strategic environmental assessment/sustainability appraisal will have been undertaken and that evidence would have been gathered and applied to demonstrate the relative suitability, capacity, deliverability and consistency with matters such as regional (RSS QE 1, 5 and 6) and national planning policy has been determined. At present whether or not this has occurred is unclear. In this respect we refer you to our previous correspondence of 25 September 2009, our specific comments relating to the evidence base and also to the recently published PPS5 and its associated good practice guide.
Please note that English Heritage considers that this apparent shortcoming is fundamental to the soundness of the Core Strategy.
In addition to this generic maxim please find an initial observation on each site based, unfortunately, on a rather crude desk top consideration.
Site 6 - Land at Baginton
This substantial area of proposed development includes designated and undesignated historic assets of great significance. Before any principle is established a specific historic environment assessment must be undertaken to fully understand the landscapes special historic interest, the locations of particular historic significance and sensitivity and the areas subsequent capacity to accommodate change and where this might take place and what form it might take.
It is important to understand the value of the historic landscape as a whole, its setting and integrity and not just the individual cultural highlights.