Alternative Sites Consultation

Search representations

Results for Kenilworth Society search

New search New search

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 44235

Received: 08/04/2010

Respondent: Kenilworth Society

Representation Summary:

Green belt land in the Thickthorn area has already been identified as suitable for development.

A further allocation in this area would impose severe strains on the local infrastructure. Glasshouse Lane, Crewe Lane, Dalehouse Lane and A46 Stoneleigh and Thickthorn Roundabouts are heavily used now and struggling to meet demand. There are also serious concerns that large scale new development will bring about a re-occurrence of drainage problems that affected Ashow in the past.

There is a lack of public transport in South Eastern Kenilworth as none of the major transport routes run through this area.

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 44236

Received: 08/04/2010

Respondent: Kenilworth Society

Representation Summary:

Green belt land in the Thickthorn area has already been identified as suitable for development.

A further allocation in this area would impose severe strains on the local infrastructure. Glasshouse Lane, Crewe Lane, Dalehouse Lane and A46 Stoneleigh and Thickthorn Roundabouts are heavily used now and struggling to meet demand. There are also serious concerns that large scale new development will bring about a re-occurrence of drainage problems that affected Ashow in the past.

There is a lack of public transport in South Eastern Kenilworth as none of the major transport routes run through this area.

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?

Representation ID: 44237

Received: 08/04/2010

Respondent: Kenilworth Society

Representation Summary:

Development of this site would result in a major extension of the urban fringe of Coventry, a strategically important section of the Green Belt. It is understood that the University have planning permission to greatly increase their campus facilities and whereas this is expected to be well considered development, it will in effect substantially close the gap between the settlements. It is recommended the areas outside of the University are retained as Green Belt.
There are ancient woodlands on the site.Development would overload existing road network.
It would have an adverse impact on the regeneration programme of Coventry.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.