Alternative Sites Consultation
Search representations
Results for Sport England search
New searchObject
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 43789
Received: 31/03/2010
Respondent: Sport England
Until there is a robust up to date playing field strategy adopted it would be presumptuous to allocate this site for development.
Also should it be found to be that the existing cricket club is looking to be relocated and the site is declared 'surplus' through a playing pitch strategy, then the site should not be redeveloped until the cricket club is relocated on another site. This is in line with policy SC6 of the adopted Local Plan.
Until there is a robust up to date playing field strategy adopted it would be presumptuous to allocate this site for development.
Also should it be found to be that the existing cricket club is looking to be relocated and the site is declared 'surplus' through a playing pitch strategy, then the site should not be redeveloped until the cricket club is relocated on another site. This is in line with policy SC6 of the adopted Local Plan.
Object
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?
Representation ID: 43790
Received: 31/03/2010
Respondent: Sport England
Until there is a robust up to date playing field strategy adopted it would be presumptuous to allocate this site for development.
The school has a number of playing pitches and a grass athletics track. We would suggest that the principles of policy SC6 of the adopted Local Plan is applied concerning the sports facilties.
Until there is a robust up to date playing field strategy adopted it would be presumptuous to allocate this site for development.
The school has a number of playing pitches and a grass athletics track. We would suggest that the principles of policy SC6 of the adopted Local Plan is applied concerning the sports facilties.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Glebe Farm, Cubbington?
Representation ID: 43791
Received: 31/03/2010
Respondent: Sport England
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?
Representation ID: 43792
Received: 31/03/2010
Respondent: Sport England
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?
Representation ID: 43793
Received: 31/03/2010
Respondent: Sport England
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
Object
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?
Representation ID: 43794
Received: 31/03/2010
Respondent: Sport England
There is a concern with this proposal that it could result in a loss of a golf course. Work should be done to ascertain that the golf course is 'surplus'. We would suggest that the principles of policy SC6 of the adopted Local Plan are applied.
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
There is a concern with this proposal that it could result in a loss of a golf course. Work should be done to ascertain that the golf course is 'surplus'. We would suggest that the principles of policy SC6 of the adopted Local Plan are applied.
Suitable contributions/land should be set a side within the development or off site for meeting the sporting infrastructure which will be needed by the new residents. This is in line with the principles of PPS 1.
