Alternative Sites Consultation
Search representations
Results for Norton Lindsey Parish Council search
New search
New search
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Representation Summary:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation
Full text:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Representation Summary:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation
Full text:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Representation Summary:
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Full text:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Representation Summary:
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Full text:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Representation Summary:
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Full text:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Representation Summary:
Site 6 This site though partially developed, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Full text:
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.
