Alternative Sites Consultation
Search representations
Results for Norton Lindsey Parish Council search
New searchComment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 44386
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 44387
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?
Representation ID: 44388
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?
Representation ID: 44389
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?
Representation ID: 44390
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?
Representation ID: 44391
Received: 28/03/2010
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Site 6 This site though partially developed, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .
Site 1A&1B. This site extends the envelope of development of Kenilworth and removes a green lung and recreational area close to the conurbation.
Site 2. This site appears to provide many advantages being close to an area of employment, transportation, schools and Play areas while not significantly increasing the town envelope.
Site 3 No comments
Site 4 This site would significantly effect the remaining pleasant approach to Warwick town from the north, while the proposal to extend beyond the A45 Bye Pass should not be entertained..
Site 5 We can see no advantages to the development of this site since it requires full infrastructure developments to avoid another commutor area.
Site 6 This site though partially developped, provides some open areas to the neighbouring conerbation and would encroach on the flood plains .