Alternative Sites Consultation

Search representations

Results for British Waterways search

New search New search

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 44375

Received: 04/03/2010

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Our priorities relate to development with the land within and immediately adjacent to the canal corridor. British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges, run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits.

Full text:

Our priorities relate to the canal corridor and land and development within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. With any type of development British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges and run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, prevent the waterways potential for being fully unlocked or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways can be used as tools in place making and place shaping, and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits such a location can generate for all parts of the community.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 44376

Received: 04/03/2010

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Our priorities relate to development with the land within and immediately adjacent to the canal corridor. British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges, run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits.

Full text:

Our priorities relate to the canal corridor and land and development within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. With any type of development British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges and run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, prevent the waterways potential for being fully unlocked or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways can be used as tools in place making and place shaping, and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits such a location can generate for all parts of the community.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?

Representation ID: 44377

Received: 04/03/2010

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Our priorities relate to development with the land within and immediately adjacent to the canal corridor. British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges, run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits.

Full text:

Our priorities relate to the canal corridor and land and development within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. With any type of development British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges and run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, prevent the waterways potential for being fully unlocked or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways can be used as tools in place making and place shaping, and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits such a location can generate for all parts of the community.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Glebe Farm, Cubbington?

Representation ID: 44378

Received: 04/03/2010

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Our priorities relate to development with the land within and immediately adjacent to the canal corridor. British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges, run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits.

Full text:

Our priorities relate to the canal corridor and land and development within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. With any type of development British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges and run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, prevent the waterways potential for being fully unlocked or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways can be used as tools in place making and place shaping, and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits such a location can generate for all parts of the community.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?

Representation ID: 44379

Received: 04/03/2010

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Our priorities relate to development with the land within and immediately adjacent to the canal corridor. British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges, run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits.

Full text:

Our priorities relate to the canal corridor and land and development within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. With any type of development British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges and run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, prevent the waterways potential for being fully unlocked or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways can be used as tools in place making and place shaping, and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits such a location can generate for all parts of the community.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?

Representation ID: 44380

Received: 04/03/2010

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Our priorities relate to development with the land within and immediately adjacent to the canal corridor. British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges, run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits.

Full text:

Our priorities relate to the canal corridor and land and development within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. With any type of development British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges and run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, prevent the waterways potential for being fully unlocked or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways can be used as tools in place making and place shaping, and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits such a location can generate for all parts of the community.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?

Representation ID: 44381

Received: 04/03/2010

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Our priorities relate to development with the land within and immediately adjacent to the canal corridor. British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges, run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits.

Full text:

Our priorities relate to the canal corridor and land and development within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. With any type of development British Waterways would require development to not adversely affect the integrity of the waterway structure, quality of the water, result in unauthorised discharges and run off or encroachment, detrimentally affect the landscape, heritage, ecological quality and character of the waterways, prevent the waterways potential for being fully unlocked or discourage the use of the waterway network. The waterways can be used as tools in place making and place shaping, and contribute to the creation of sustainable communities. British Waterways would seek for any development to relate appropriately to the waterway and optimise the benefits such a location can generate for all parts of the community.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.