Alternative Sites Consultation

Search representations

Results for BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together) search

New search New search

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 43834

Received: 04/04/2010

Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)

Representation Summary:

B.L.A.S.T. is opposed to building on growing land on Green Belt. B.L.A.S.T. suggests that all future development must include adequate growing land as part of the development ie 100 houses = 25 allotment plots provided by the developer

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 43835

Received: 04/04/2010

Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)

Representation Summary:

B.L.A.S.T. is opposed to building on growing land on Green Belt. B.L.A.S.T. suggests that all future development must include adequate growing land as part of the development ie 100 houses = 25 allotment plots provided by the developer

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Glebe Farm, Cubbington?

Representation ID: 43837

Received: 04/04/2010

Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)

Representation Summary:

B.L.A.S.T. is opposed to building on growing land on Green Belt. B.L.A.S.T. suggests that all future development must include adequate growing land as part of the development ie 100 houses = 25 allotment plots provided by the developer

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?

Representation ID: 43838

Received: 04/04/2010

Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)

Representation Summary:

B.L.A.S.T. is opposed to building on growing land on Green Belt. B.L.A.S.T. suggests that all future development must include adequate growing land as part of the development ie 100 houses = 25 allotment plots provided by the developer

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?

Representation ID: 43839

Received: 04/04/2010

Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)

Representation Summary:

B.L.A.S.T. is opposed to building on growing land on Green Belt. B.L.A.S.T. suggests that all future development must include adequate growing land as part of the development ie 100 houses = 25 allotment plots provided by the developer

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?

Representation ID: 43840

Received: 04/04/2010

Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)

Representation Summary:

B.L.A.S.T. is opposed to building on growing land on Green Belt. B.L.A.S.T. suggests that all future development must include adequate growing land as part of the development ie 100 houses = 25 allotment plots provided by the developer

Object

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?

Representation ID: 43844

Received: 04/04/2010

Respondent: BLAST (Bringing Leamington Allotment Societies Together)

Representation Summary:

B.L.A.S.T. is opposed to building on growing land on Green Belt. B.L.A.S.T. suggests that all future development must include adequate growing land as part of the development ie 100 houses = 25 allotment plots provided by the developer

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.