Alternative Sites Consultation
Search representations
Results for Heathcote Park Residents Association search
New searchSupport
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 44623
Received: 17/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
Support
Object
Support
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 44625
Received: 17/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
Support
Object
Support
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?
Representation ID: 44626
Received: 17/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
Support, providing the provision of a new school is paramount and ring fenced into building proposals with adequate playing fields protected.
Object
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Glebe Farm, Cubbington?
Representation ID: 44627
Received: 17/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
Would prefer to see a buffer around Hill Farm House, does this overpower the existing Lillington lifestyle?
Object
Support
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?
Representation ID: 44628
Received: 17/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
The best alternative site submitted. Core needed with the development. Any additional housing for University students would release housing for people needing space nearer town centres of Leamington, Warwick.
Object
Support
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?
Representation ID: 44629
Received: 17/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
Part greenfield, part brown - a very large amount of land requiring full services input to the development - would schools be needed etc.
Object
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Feedback - General Comments
Representation ID: 44659
Received: 17/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
The Committee would follow the majority of the alternative sites in the original Bishops Tachbrook submission.
Object
Comment
Alternative Sites Consultation
Feedback - General Comments
Representation ID: 45015
Received: 30/03/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
As a resident of Heathcote park - Park homes, Harbury Lane. I am aware that the Residents Association have submitted their comments to you on their behalf. However I do further support this excellent response from Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council.
As a resident of Heathcote park - Park homes, Harbury Lane. I am aware that the Residents Association have submitted their comments to you on their behalf. However I do further support this excellent response from Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council.
Support
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 45943
Received: 30/06/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
Supports development at Kenilworth Wardens and Woodside Training Centre as this is a sensible extension to the site at Thickthorn upon previously developed land.
More should be done to incorporate brown field or previously developed land before building on greenfield. Development should be dispersed through the district rather than burdening the infrastructure in one place.
Supports development at Kenilworth Wardens and Woodside Training Centre as this is a sensible extension to the site at Thickthorn upon previously developed land.
Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.
Objects to development at Glebe Farm, Cubbington but considers that development of the north western corner adjacent to Cubbington would be acceptable.
Objects to the development of Loes Farm but considers that a small development next to the Saxon Mill.
Objects to the development of Hurst Farm, Burton Green but a small extension to the University of Warwick would be acceptable.
Objects to development of the land around Baginton airport but considers that development of the large brown field site south of the airport would be acceptable.
Support
Alternative Sites Consultation
Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?
Representation ID: 45944
Received: 30/06/2010
Respondent: Heathcote Park Residents Association
Supports development at Kenilworth Wardens and Woodside Training Centre as this is a sensible extension to the site at Thickthorn upon previously developed land.
More should be done to incorporate brown field or previously developed land before building on greenfield. Development should be dispersed through the district rather than burdening the infrastructure in one place.
Supports development at Kenilworth Wardens and Woodside Training Centre as this is a sensible extension to the site at Thickthorn upon previously developed land.
Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.
Objects to development at Glebe Farm, Cubbington but considers that development of the north western corner adjacent to Cubbington would be acceptable.
Objects to the development of Loes Farm but considers that a small development next to the Saxon Mill.
Objects to the development of Hurst Farm, Burton Green but a small extension to the University of Warwick would be acceptable.
Objects to development of the land around Baginton airport but considers that development of the large brown field site south of the airport would be acceptable.
