Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Gallagher Estates search
New searchSupport
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Regeneration?
Representation ID: 33821
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?
Representation ID: 33822
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Rural Communities, particularly in respect of rural housing?
Representation ID: 33824
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
The level of growth required to make village services viable is a subjective approach, unless limited, could lead to inappropriate levels of development seemingly at odds with addressing the causes of climate change.
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Representation ID: 33825
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
There is a need for a more rigorous testing of the development capacity of each of the Preferred Options.
Support
Publication Draft
(vi) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Representation ID: 33826
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Support the general preferred locations of new housing and in particular the Land at Lower Heathcote Farm. We control in excess of 50% of the land and with the other two major landowners wish to deliver a comprehensive sustainable urban extension to the south of Harbury Lane.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
Representation ID: 33827
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Predetermining housing mix is unnecessarily restrictive and removes the ability to respond rapidly to changes in demand.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Representation ID: 33828
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Increasing the proportion of affordable housing may not deliver greater numbers and may be counter productive. Threshold needs to be based on viability as well as need.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
Representation ID: 33829
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Flexibility on density is important to allow designers to respond to site specific issues.
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?
Representation ID: 33830
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
This question is irrelevant as the Core Strategy will have to conform with the RSS.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 33831
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
Welcome the opportunity to discuss the approach to securing developer contributions.
