Publication Draft

Support

Representation ID: 33798

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support, but there should be reference to providing different types of residential accommodation being required in the future.

Support

Representation ID: 33799

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Agree with the Preferred Strategy and do not consider the exceptional circumstances are necessary for incursion into the Green Belt.

Support

Representation ID: 33800

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support, however, there should be reference to the possibility that further employment allocations and offices could be made outside the town centre linked to the Preferred Options.

Object

Representation ID: 33814

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Insufficient work has been done to date to be certain that the Preferred Options can accommodate the housing numbers and infrastructure. The Core Strategy should therefore contain flexibility to allow for the appropriate planning of the area, and therefore suggest the inclusion of the land south of Gallows Hill as an employment option.

If it was inappropriate to put employment on the Preferred Option sites it would provide some flexibility. It could also accommodate elements of social infrastructure serving other growth areas.

Do not accept that the development of the land would affect the setting of Castle Park.

Object

Representation ID: 33815

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Insufficient work has been done to date to be certain that the Preferred Options can accommodate the housing numbers and infrastructure. The Core Strategy should therefore contain flexibility to allow for the appropriate planning of the area, and therefore suggest the inclusion of the land south of Gallows Hill as an employment option.

If it was inappropriate to put employment on the Preferred Option sites it would provide some flexibility. It could also accommodate elements of social infrastructure serving other growth areas.

Do not accept that the development of the land would affect the setting of Castle Park.

Object

Representation ID: 33816

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Insufficient work has been done to date to be certain that the Preferred Options can accommodate the housing numbers and infrastructure. The Core Strategy should therefore contain flexibility to allow for the appropriate planning of the area, and therefore suggest the inclusion of the land south of Gallows Hill as an employment option.

If it was inappropriate to put employment on the Preferred Option sites it would provide some flexibility. It could also accommodate elements of social infrastructure serving other growth areas.

Do not accept that the development of the land would affect the setting of Castle Park.

Support

Representation ID: 33817

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support, but B1 development can also be accommodated outside town centres.

Support

Representation ID: 33818

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33819

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33820

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support