Publication Draft

Object

Representation ID: 33653

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Barton Willmore

We do not object in principle to the designation of an Area of Restraint between Heathcote Farm and Bishops Tachbrook. However, the boundary should be amended adjacent to the village in order to allow for some limited development and should therefore follow the line of the most northern part of the village. The boundary should also be flexible to allow for local services and facilities.

The designation between Leamington and Radford Semele should also be amended to allow for some limited development adjoining the village. The exact line should follow the most western part of the development.

Support

Representation ID: 33875

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Support, however, where significant community advantage can be brought forward as a result of new development allocation, then such proposals should be given greater weight in the determination of allocation choice and priority.

Comment

Representation ID: 33876

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Emphasise the significant educational, general community, recreational and environmental advanatages that can emerge from substantial residential development at South Sydenham.

Comment

Representation ID: 33877

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Agreed, pending the final determination of the RSS.

Comment

Representation ID: 33878

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

The Sydenham and Whitnash areas display serious indicators of declining services in both public and private facilities. The proposals put forward in respect of South Sydenham can redress a number of these deficiencies and act as a catalyst for regeneration.

Comment

Representation ID: 33879

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

The proposals for South Sydenham should be introduced as a major regeneration component.

Object

Representation ID: 33880

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

The proposals put forward in respect of South Sydenham bring forward a catalyst for regeneration in this area and a substantial new school proposal. Priority should be given to development proposals that bring forward regeneration/gain to existing communities.

Support

Representation ID: 33881

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Support, however, where significant regeneration/community gain can emerge from new development, other standards (notably social housing standards) may need to be treated on a site specific basis.

Support

Representation ID: 33882

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Support, however, where significant regeneration/community gain can emerge from new development, other standards (notably social housing standards) may need to be treated on a site specific basis.

Comment

Representation ID: 33883

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Density needs to respond to site circumstances.