Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for A C Lloyd search
New searchSupport
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?
Representation ID: 33643
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Support the proposal to direct most of the growth towards Warwick/Leamington with some growth in rural areas. This is in accordance with the RSS.
Support for the growth strategy in that it ensures development is able to build on an existing core of development to the south and therefore ensures short travel to work journeys.
Support
Publication Draft
(i) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Representation ID: 33644
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Support and can deliver a proportion of employment land as part of the development of land at Lower Heathcote Farm to deliver a sustainable mixed urban extension. It is logical that this element of development be located directly opposite the existing Gallaghers Business Park to create an employment core.
Support
Publication Draft
(vi) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Representation ID: 33645
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Support the identification of land at Heathcote Farm as a sustainable urban extension. This will be a high quality urban extension capable of providing appropriate local services and facilities as required. Offers the opportunity to deliver housing utilising largely capacity in existing infrastructure. Site is capable of providing significant open space of benefit to the wider area. The site is well related to existing development. There are no technical constraints which preclude development.
A phasing restriction on the site will cause problems with delivery, in terms of infrastructure.
Support
Publication Draft
(iv) Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash
Representation ID: 33646
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Support the identification of land south of Sydenham.
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?
Representation ID: 33647
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Consideration should be given to the potential for an increase in housing numbers through the review of the RSS. Flexibility should be built into the document at this stage to accommodate an increase in housing or potential non-delivery of sites.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Representation ID: 33648
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Object to significant numbers of windfall housing being delivered in the plan period. Windfalls are in short supply and this presents uncertainty on housing delivery. Protecting employment land from redevelopment will diminish supply.
Object
Publication Draft
(i) Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington
Representation ID: 33649
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Do not consider this site will come forward for development before 2016 due to little developer interest and given the number of constraints on site.
Object
Publication Draft
(ii) Land at Station Approach, Leamington
Representation ID: 33650
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Do not consider this site will come forward for development before 2016 due to little developer interest and given the number of constraints on site.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
Representation ID: 33651
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Do not wish to see a prescriptive housing mix included for the strategic sites to apply for the whole plan period. Any mix has to take account of need and local demand for housing.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Representation ID: 33652
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Barton Willmore
We do not support a requirement of 50% affordable housing as there is no basis for this figure.
