Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Finham Brook Flood Action Group search

New search

Form ID: 77856

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option W2a: Include a policy on Health Impact Assessments

selected

Option W2b: Do not include a policy on Health Impact Assessments

selected

Form ID: 77858

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option B5a: Explore and pursue an integrated Environmental Net Gain Policy

selected

Option B5b: Explore environmental net gain through separate policies

selected

Option B5c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 77859

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-B9: Should the plan include a policy requiring the safeguarding of sites of national importance, sites of local importance, and other non-designated sites known to make a positive contribution to biodiversity or geodiversity; unless the benefits of the proposal clearly outweigh the need to protect the site. Where possible conserve and enhance these sites.

Yes

Q-B10: Please add any comments you wish to make about a biodiverse and environmentally resilient South Warwickshire

No answer given

Form ID: 77863

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-P1.1: Do you agree with the proposed broad content of the Part 1 plan?

Q-P1.2: If no, please indicate why

Flooding is a strategic issue and should be included in Part 1. Development of SUDs for new schemes should be included from the outset of any plans, and by putting this into part 2 it gives the wrong signals to developers.

Form ID: 77864

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-P1.3: Do you agree with the selection of policies to be addressed in the Part 1 plan?

Q-P1.4: If not, please indicate why

I believe that FW2, Sustainable Drainage, should be included in Part 1. Sustainable drainage is best addressed at the initial design phase of any development to be most effective. By only including this in Part 2, it does not encourage developers to give this the priority that it requires. I consider that this IS a strategic issue.

Form ID: 77865

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option W3a: Include an overall policy on health

selected

Option W3b: Do not include a policy on health

selected

Form ID: 77866

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 77867

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

selected

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

selected

Form ID: 83723

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-I1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Sustainability Appraisal, indicating clearly which element of the appraisal you are commenting on.

Issue I1 - I do not feel that the sustainability appraisal goes far enough, as the flood impact assessment only includes the impact of flooding at new sites, it does not address the impact of flooding from new development at other sites. This is particularly concerning since several of the proposed development areas are in the watershed of the Finham Brook, which already causes issues with flooding locally.

Form ID: 83724

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

Issue S7.1 - see comments above [Issue I1]. I do not agree with the conclusion that none of the proposed sites have any issues with flooding.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.