Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Leamington Society search

Form ID: 73157

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-I1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Sustainability Appraisal, indicating clearly which element of the appraisal you are commenting on.

As the predictions of future population and energy supplies are so uncertain most of this is guesswork

Form ID: 73158

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

selected

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

selected

Form ID: 73159

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

There should be a presumption in favour of previously developed land and buildings

Form ID: 73160

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 73161

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S2a: Identify areas considered particularly suited to intensification development, and develop a design code for each character area. Have a policy supporting intensification within these identified areas where it complies with the relevant design code.

selected

Option S2b: Have a policy with 'in principle' support for intensification development, applicable across South Warwickshire; and develop design codes

selected

Option S2c: Do not have a policy which encourages intensification

selected

Form ID: 73162

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

There should be a presumption in favour of redeveloping previously used land and avoiding green field sites all over the county

Form ID: 73163

Respondent: Leamington Society

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 73164

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 73166

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Nothing chosen

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 73167

Respondent: Leamington Society

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

Variation is too small to be credible - these predictions have big error margins

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.