Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Burton Green Parish Council search

New search

Form ID: 75412

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-I4.1: Should we include a policy to safeguard specific infrastructure schemes within the SWLP?

Yes

Q-I4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about these specific safeguarding provisions

Whilst the Council agrees that there should be a policy, land within the Green Belt should NOT be safeguarded for future infrastructure schemes.

Form ID: 75413

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

Burton Green Parish Council supports the need for the development strategy of South Warwickshire to be both deliverable and viable.

Form ID: 75414

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 75420

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 75421

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 75422

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 75423

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Form ID: 75425

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 75427

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

The HS2 route should not be considered a railway corridor as it does not serves South Warwickshire; land in this corridor should not be seen area of potential spatial growth

Form ID: 75428

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Option E4.1a: Include a policy supporting diversification

selected

Option E4.1b: Do not include a specific policy on diversification

selected

Option E4.2a: Include a policy supporting small-scale employment opportunities in rural areas

selected

Option E4.2b: Do not include a policy supporting small-scale employment opportunities in rural areas

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.