Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Ragley Estate search

New search

Form ID: 82823

Respondent: Ragley Estate

Agent: Stansgate Planning

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 82825

Respondent: Ragley Estate

Agent: Stansgate Planning

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Nothing chosen

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 82827

Respondent: Ragley Estate

Agent: Stansgate Planning

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Inappropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Inappropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Appropriate strategy

Form ID: 82829

Respondent: Ragley Estate

Agent: Stansgate Planning

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.