Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Deeley Group Limited search

Form ID: 78170

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Yes

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 78172

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Option E2a: Include a policy which encourages businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2b: Do not include a policy encouraging businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2c: Include a policy which looks to identify sites or development zones which are targeted at businesses wishing to be innovative towards a low carbon economy.

selected

Form ID: 78174

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Option E5a: Include a policy which supports a range of business units

selected

Option E5b: Do not include a policy in Part 1

selected

Form ID: 78175

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Option E6a: Include a policy which protects South Warwickshire's economic assets.

selected

Option E6b: Do not include a policy protecting all these economic assets

selected

Form ID: 78176

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Option E7.1a: Include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.1b: Do not include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.2a: Include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Option E7.2b: Do not include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Form ID: 78177

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-E8.1: Do you agree that the existing employment allocations, including the revisions to Atherstone Airfield, should be carried over into the SWLP?

Yes

Q-E8.2: If, no please list the sites that should be excluded and give reasons.

No answer given

Q-E8.3: Do you agree that proposals seeking the loss of a business, commercial or community building or facility should be subject to marketing, viability and alternative use tests?

Nothing chosen

Q-E8.4: Pease specify what you consider to be appropriate tests

No answer given

Form ID: 78179

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-E11: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering South Warwickshire's economic needs

- Q-E2: We support Option E2a as the there is a need to promote the principle of a low carbon economy but such policies should not be overly prescriptive as much of the guidance for sustainable design comes through national policy and building regulations which ensures a consistent approach across the country. Local policies or requirements above national policy may discourage economic growth in South Warwickshire. - Q-E5: Option E5b – We do not support the inclusion of policies which dictate employment unit sizes. Whilst we understand the reasoning, the reality is that the market supplies business units of all sizes and responds to market gaps. If there is an under supply in one area, the market will respond. - Q-E6: We support Option E6a, to include a policy which generally protects South Warwickshire’s economic assets but such policies must always be written flexibly to allow for changes in circumstances and provide criteria for acceptable land use change. - Q-E7.1: We support the inclusion of a policy that would direct employment to the identified Core Opportunity Area, as identified. This will help provide spatial clarity to the economic strategy and help to focus growth in the most appropriate locations. - Q-E7.2: As part of a comprehensive approach to economic growth, we consider it would be appropriate to include a policy to support additional growth at existing major investment sites. Specifically with regard to the Gaydon Area, the existing land that has been allocated in the Stratford Core Strategy for use by JLR only should now be reconsidered and brought forward for general light industrial, manufacturing and logistics uses. It has become very clear in recent years that JLR does not have a direct requirement for expansion into this area but the site remains extremely well located to support both the manufacturing industry and the logistics market. The release of this site should come forward ahead of any additional employment land in the Gaydon area. We strongly disagree with the suggestion that the area would not be suitable for logistics. - Q-E8.1: Yes, we strongly agree that existing employment allocations should be carried over into the SWLP, specifically in regard to Land at Gaydon. However, as per our response to E7.2, the occupier specific restriction relating to JLR should be removed when carried forward to the SWLP. Given the lack of take up from JLR since the adoption of the Stratford Core Strategy, we consider that the allocation should be brought forward for general light industrial, manufacturing and logistics uses. Of course, this wouldn’t preclude JLR from occupying the site (or part of) and meeting any expansion growth requirements in the future. The site is extremely well located to support both the manufacturing industry and the logistics market and given that this site is an existing allocation, this site should come forward ahead of any additional employment land in the Gaydon area.

Form ID: 78180

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-H1-1: The HEDNA is proposing that we move away from an approach where future household needs are based on the 2014-based household projections towards a trend-based approach. Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of housing need across South Warwickshire?

Yes

Q-H1-2: If your answer to H1-1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future housing needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 78181

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-H2-1: What is the best way to significantly increase the supply of affordable housing across South Warwickshire?

No answer given

Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement

selected

Option H2-2b: Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts

selected

Option H2-2c: A more localised approach with separate affordable housing requirements for different localities across South Warwickshire

selected

Q-H2-3: How should South Warwickshire best address the specialist needs for older people?

No answer given

Form ID: 78182

Respondent: Deeley Group Limited

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-H4-1: Do you agree with the approach of contributing to meeting the Birmingham and Black Country HMA shortfall to 2031 on the identified sites in Stratford-on-Avon District?

Yes

Q-H4-2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the scale of the shortfall from the Birmingham and Black Country HMA that South Warwickshire should accommodate within the South Warwickshire Local Plan

No answer given

Q-H4-3: If we are required to meet housing shortfalls from outside of South Warwickshire, how best and where should we accommodate such shortfalls?

-We agree that South Warwickshire needs to contribute towards meeting the housing needs of the Birmingham and Black Country HMA. A joined-up approach is required by all the Local Planning Authorities to agree the scale of shortfall to be met by each LPA. Spatially this need should be located as close to those authorities as is feasible.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.